Typically you want to build consistency in your offensive line group. The only reason you would replace one of your starting in the middle of a drive would be due to injury. Makes sense...that's the way it always has been done. However...
Let's just say, hypothetically, that Sean Mahan is a better guard than a center like some folks here are saying. Imagine that he wins the LG job with Hartwig at center and everything else stays the same. Marvel-Mahan-Hartwig-Simmons-Colon. (Note: this is not my favorite alignment, personally...I'm just throwing around hypothetical possibilities). That is a smallish o-line by recent NFL standards. Using the weights listed in the roster on Steelers.com, that would be 321-301-312-315-315. We are running more zone blocking schemes now, and teams like Denver that were early proponents of zone blocking tended to have more undersized, athletic o-lineman as opposed to the behemoths employed by teams like Dallas.
If we used that starting five, though, would that be the best option considering that we also want to use a power running attack in the red zone with Mendenhall? What if you made wholesale changes by putting in your biggest o-linemen for short-yardage and goalline sitations? Something like Marvel-Kemo-Legursky-Colon-Starks. 321-344-323-315-337. That's 11 more pounds at center, 22 more pounds at RT, and 43 more pounds at LG. Throw in a couple of TE's and a FB to give you well over a ton of beef clearing a path for our RB's...good luck stopping Rocket Rashard from scoring in goal-to-go situations.
Would it be foolhardy to consider using one o-line alignment between the 20's when you will be using multiple WR's sets and possibly Arians' pony backfield, then switching everything up once you get in close? I've never seen anything like it done on this level before. It could be a disaster like teams that have tried to switch off between 2 QB's within a single game, but I was just thinking outside the box...
Bookmarks