[QUOTE=MicroBioSteel;522116]Actually the team already bounces between 34 and 43 formations right now....I'm just suggesting that more use of the 43 might be more productive given available talent, current injury status, and the way the officials are calling the game.[/QUOTE]
Considering how much time the Steelers will likely have to spend in Nickel, Big Nickel, Dime and any other passing down packages, I would imagine that the Steelers would naturally use more 4 DL alignments as opposed to 5 LB alignments (like the Packers) simply due to the health and depth of the LBs...
[QUOTE=phillyesq;522110]If I recall, during the time of the Colts/Bears Super Bowl, you were calling for a 4-3 Tampa-2 style defense. After last year, you were calling for a 4-3 that attacked more like the Giants.[/QUOTE]
IMO the Giants have the right recipe. For me it has consistently been about an attacking DL regardless of what they are doin on the backside.
Lebeau an innovator?
Guys been washed up for 10 years now:rolleyes:
[QUOTE=pittpete;522132]Lebeau an innovator?
Guys been washed up for 10 years now:rolleyes:[/QUOTE]
You are too harsh...5 years:stirpot
The whole point of a Tampa 2 defense is an attacking front 4...