[QUOTE=Shawn;517173]I think Wallace will be playing for another team next season.[/QUOTE]
It's funny all these commenters on NFL.com that want Wallace on their teams. The biggest requests seem to be coming from Saints fans (probably since Mike is from NO) along with Patriots and Broncos fans.
As if the Saints didn't already have enough Offense.
3 minutes ago via WhoSay Broadcast.
Steelers GM Kevin Colbert told @Edwerderespn that "Mike Wallace is not available for trade."
I would not be adverse to trading him. Too bad he's not available for trade. I don't see this ending well for the relationship that is needed to make a long term run with the B&G. Unless Wallace gives his agent a talking to about changing the approach to this, it will be a debacle.
[B]What the Brown signing means[/B]
FRIDAY, JULY 27, 2012
posted by Dale Lolley
After having Mike Wallace spurn a similar offer, the Steelers signed wide receiver Antonio Brown to a five-year, $42-million contract extension on Friday.
What does this mean for Wallace?
It means that his days with the Steelers are numbered.
After giving Brown a big deal, the Steelers aren't likely to hand out another one at the same position.
So his options now are to report to camp, sign his tender and hope he has another big season, or hold out until there are six games left in the season, report, and become a free agent at the end of the year, hoping that somebody will make him a big offer.
He's got a much better chance of getting a big deal next season if he goes out and tears it up this season than he does if he doesn't play.
Brown's contract also likely means that the Steelers won't use the franchise tag on Wallace, either.