[url]http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/ike-taylor-has-fibula-injury-could-be-significant/[/url]
Sucks.
Printable View
[url]http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/ike-taylor-has-fibula-injury-could-be-significant/[/url]
Sucks.
[QUOTE=Djfan;535812][URL]http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/02/ike-taylor-has-fibula-injury-could-be-significant/[/URL]
Sucks.[/QUOTE]
I read on Steelers.com that MRI is pending, which to me means: 1) no broken bone, and 2) any talking head that writes like he knows what the injury is/the time to be missed will be is completely, totally, and embarrasingly making it all up.
If Ike broke his leg he would of laid on the field and probably would of been carted off...you would think anyway.
So.... Cortez or Curtis?
They wrapped it in ICE and then put a boot on it. Sounds like a High Ankle Sprain to me!
[QUOTE][COLOR=#CCCCCC]If Ike broke his leg he would of laid on the field and probably would of been carted off...you would think anyway.[/COLOR][/QUOTE]\
Not necessarily true.
My son broke his tibia in a game earlier this year.
He played the rest of the game on it, had xrays the next day and no break was seen.
Not until a week later of him complaining that it hurt to walk, did he have an MRI.
It revealed the fracture
Typical PFT reporting. Rush to press without facts and if you are right you claim that you broke it, if you are wrong you ignore it.
[QUOTE=Chadman;535833]So.... Cortez or Curtis?[/QUOTE]
Allen is going to be a stud. I have no problem putting the kid out there and seeing what he can do. He really showed well yesterday and will only get better.