-
[QUOTE=lloydroid;555050]I am still curious how you condemn reactionary posts as bad for the board, and then revel in posting inflammatory posts yourself. Seems more than a tad hypocritical. Are you comfortable dealing in hypocrisy?[/QUOTE]
I don't think Chadman's posts are inflamatory. I think they are amusing. JMHO
-
[QUOTE=ikestops85;555059]I don't think Chadman's posts are inflamatory. I think they are amusing. JMHO[/QUOTE]
If it hadn't been for this response Chadman might have missed this comment. Probably would have been ok with that... :D
Still, in the name of charity & goodwill, in response to the 'hypocrisy' comment- the problem is not necessarily 'inflamatory posts', so much as the volume of 'inflamatory posts'. Some posters seem more prone to sprouting 'made for emotive' responses than others...
-
chadman usually hits the right notes when he decides to provoke banter.
others, not so much.
-
[QUOTE=ikestops85;555059]I don't think Chadman's posts are inflamatory. I think they are amusing. JMHO[/QUOTE]
[COLOR=#00ff00]X2 ... and with informative content and interesting perspectives, too.
[/COLOR]
-
Aww shucks.... you guys... :D
-
[QUOTE=Chadman;555063]If it hadn't been for this response Chadman might have missed this comment. Probably would have been ok with that... :D
Still, in the name of charity & goodwill, in response to the 'hypocrisy' comment- the problem is not necessarily 'inflamatory posts', so much as the volume of 'inflamatory posts'. Some posters seem more prone to sprouting 'made for emotive' responses than others...[/QUOTE]
Hmmm, not really a complete answer. You haven't commented purely on volume (you have, but not always) but you have whined about reactionary posts....but then you admittedly did the same. When you speak out against something but then practice the very same act, as you condemn, it's still hypocrisy. No different than anti gay republicans getting caught soliciting for oral sex in a male bathroom.
[url]http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/03/larry-craig-airport-bathroom_n_1739142.html[/url]
-
[QUOTE=Eddie Spaghetti;555064]chadman usually hits the right notes when he decides to provoke banter.
others, not so much.[/QUOTE]
[video=youtube;XURpNoVir3k]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XURpNoVir3k[/video]
-
[QUOTE=lloydroid;555119]Hmmm, not really a complete answer. You haven't commented purely on volume (you have, but not always) but you have whined about reactionary posts....but then you admittedly did the same. When you speak out against something but then practice the very same act, as you condemn, it's still hypocrisy. No different than anti gay republicans getting caught soliciting for oral sex in a male bathroom. [/QUOTE]
I don't care about your proclivities...
When Chadman makes an "inflammatory post" there are two things present that are lacking in your posts:
1) A long track record of quality posts. This earns you some latitude in the eyes of fellow posters. You do not have this.
2) A sense of irony, which most of the posters here find amusing. You, for the most part, are not amusing.