Jake Locker out against Steelers

[Ghost]

B/c of a shoulder injury he won't even be active for the game. Hasselbeck will be the starter.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/football/nfl/10/08/titans-locker-hurt.ap/index.html?sct=hp_t2_a12&eref=sihp

[steeler_fan_in_t.o.]

Today Hasselbeck is the more dangerous QB. Locker is their future so was getting the PT, but we aren't catching any break by him going down. However, this should be an easy W anyway.

[flippy]

I have a feeling Matt H and Nate W might have a good game against us. Matt to make up for the SuperBowl loss and Nate to make up for us not keeping him.

Last time I thought we should have an easy win was against the Raiders. So I'm not letting myself have that feeling this week.

[Lebsteel]

I have a feeling Matt H and Nate W might have a good game against us. Matt to make up for the SuperBowl loss and Nate to make up for us not keeping him.

Last time I thought we should have an easy win was against the Raiders. So I'm not letting myself have that feeling this week.

Yea, let's hope the Steelers aren't feeling it is going to be an easy win...they need to keep up the same defensive intensity they had on Sunday and our WRs need to have a better game.

[Oviedo]

I'd rather face Locher than Hasselbeck. Experienced QBs can be a problem.

If we see the same attacking style on defense we will be OK. If we revert back to the passive "bend don't break" we will have a problem. Games are always tough in Nashville for us.

[stopplayn]

I have a feeling Matt H and Nate W might have a good game against us. Matt to make up for the SuperBowl loss and Nate to make up for us not keeping him.

Last time I thought we should have an easy win was against the Raiders. So I'm not letting myself have that feeling this week.

Hasselback has played us since the SB. Nate sux. But I would rather face Locker than the cerebral Hassleback. He could dink us to death and that worries me.