PDA

View Full Version : Panthers give Charles Johnson 12 mil per for 6 years



D Rock
07-26-2011, 10:42 PM
Bad news for signing Woodley to anything moderately priced.

Why do some teams just have to keep ruining it for the rest of the league?

calmkiller
07-26-2011, 10:52 PM
I don't even know who charles Johnson is....

Discipline of Steel
07-26-2011, 11:11 PM
DE i think. Is that $12 million for 6 years or $12 million per year for six years?

flippy
07-26-2011, 11:18 PM
Carolina / Johnson ruin it for DEs and OLBs

Tampa / Houston / Nnamdi will ruin CBs

Indy / Manning will ruin QBs

Washington / Santonio will probably ruin the WR position


If positions get out of whack, all we can do is buck the trend and get better players at other positions.

D Rock
07-26-2011, 11:23 PM
that is 12 per. 72 million total with 30 million signing bonus.

He is a former 3rd round pick who has played 4 years, the first three as the back up to Julius Peppers.

Sack totals: 0, 6, 4, 11.5


It should at least be a rule that you can't make more in millions than you do in sacks per year if that's what you are being paid for.

MadSteel
07-26-2011, 11:44 PM
Get used to it, with rookie contracts being considerably lower the Vets will now profit.

phillyesq
07-27-2011, 07:46 AM
Get used to it, with rookie contracts being considerably lower the Vets will now profit.

Good point. The new CBA saved them a bundle on Cam Newton.

The DE market has always been somewhat out of whack. Hopefully Woodley's agent realizes that DEs are payed differently than 3-4 OLBs.

steeler_fan_in_t.o.
07-27-2011, 09:41 AM
Indy / Manning will ruin QBs

I don't expect Indy / Manning will ruin the QB market since any comparison would be "sure, but that was Peyton Manning."

The QB situation that I expect will ruin that position is Tampa Bay / Freeman. Tampa is so far below the salary floor that they will need to find a way to spend their money. Sure, they will go out and get some FAs, but they should still have a bundle left when it comes time to look at their own. They will overpay Freeman and that is when the rest of the "good not great" QBs expect the same. We are lucky that we are currently set at the position because I think that one goes out of whack.

BURGH86STEEL
07-27-2011, 09:49 AM
Get used to it, with rookie contracts being considerably lower the Vets will now profit.

Many vets profited because some rookie contacts were high. At the end of the day, these things have a way of balancing out.

sentinel33
07-27-2011, 11:10 AM
guy has one good year and you give him that size of a contract?

Seriously??!!!

WTF!

RuthlessBurgher
07-27-2011, 12:44 PM
guy has one good year and you give him that size of a contract?

Seriously??!!!

WTF!

Carolina picked first in the draft for a reason.

feltdizz
07-27-2011, 12:54 PM
guy has one good year and you give him that size of a contract?

Seriously??!!!

WTF!

Carolina picked first in the draft for a reason.

they cleaned the books last year and where 60 million under the cap... they have money to burn and think this guy is the next Peppers...

The rumor in Charlotte is Miami and another team were going to throw big money at him. Stupid move if you ask me.


I don't see it but they also paid 20 million for 1 year of Delhomme after he threw 6 picks.