View Full Version : NHL rejects 17 year, $102 million Kovalchuk deal with Devils

07-21-2010, 10:13 AM
These long term front-loaded deals seemed to start when Detroit extended Franzen and Zetterberg last season, and then really started to stink with Hossa's deal with Chicago. It is about time the league put its foot down with regard to such ridiculousness.


NHL rejects Kovalchuk deal
ESPN.com news services
Updated: July 21, 2010, 9:56 AM ET

The NHL rejected Ilya Kovalchuk's 17-year, $102 million contract with the New Jersey Devils because it circumvents the league's salary cap, the league announced Wednesday.

"Under the CBA, the contract rejection triggers a number of possible next steps that may be elected by any or each of the NHLPA, the Player and/or the Club," NHL deputy commissioner Bill Daly said in a statement. "In the interim, the player is not entitled to play under the contract, nor is he entitled to any of the rights and benefits that are provided for thereunder. The League will have no further comment on this matter pending further developments."

The contract was rejected because years of low salary at the end of the contract were added for the sole purpose of lowering the cap hit, a person familiar with the issues raised told The Associated Press. The person added that no side believes Kovalchuk will play the final years of the deal at those terms.

The star forward was slated to earn only $550,000 in each of the last five seasons of the contract that was to run through the 2026-27 season -- when Kovalchuk would be 44.

Kovalchuk was to earn $98.5 million of the $102 million in the first 11 years of the deal.

Neither the Devils nor Kovalchuk's agent, Jay Grossman, commented after the contract was rejected.

The NHLPA will have five days from Wednesday to file a grievance on the matter, which it is expected to do. If it does, an arbitrator who is familiar with the collective bargaining agreement and agreed upon by both the league and the players' union would determine whether the league's rejection of the contract was valid.

The arbitrator would have 48 hours to decide if the league was right to reject the contract. If the arbitrator agrees, the contract would be voided, and Kovalchuk again would be an unrestricted free agent.

Kovalchuk's contract would have topped the 15-year deal goalie Rick DiPietro got from the New York Islanders, and two-time NHL MVP Alex Ovechkin's 13-year pact with Washington.

Kovalchuk was to earn $6 million each of the next two seasons, $11.5 million for the following five seasons; $10.5 million in the 2017-18 season; $8.5 million for the 2018-19 season; $6.5 million in 2019-20; $3.5 million in 2020-21; $750,000 the following season; and $550,000 for the final five years of the unprecedented deal.

The Devils would have absorbed an annual salary-cap hit of $6 million -- the average amount per season. That number was brought down because of the extended years with low salary at the end of the deal.

Whether he and the Devils can get together on a new deal remains to be seen. The Los Angeles Kings and Russia's KHL also were interested in signing Kovalchuk before he reached agreement with the Devils two weeks into the free-agent shopping season.

Few expected that New Jersey would break from tradition of not handing out long-term contracts that have become popular in the NHL since the lockout ended in 2005 and the salary-cap era began. Now that the Devils did that, their efforts quickly failed.

Kovalchuk's time with the Thrashers (more than seven seasons) ended once he rejected a 12-year, $101 million extension with Atlanta, which traded him in early February to the Devils in a five-player deal.

He totaled 41 goals and 44 assists last season when he earned $7.5 million, but posted only 10 goals and 17 assists with the Devils.

Kovalchuk had two goals and four assists during New Jersey's five-game, first-round playoff loss to Philadelphia.

Information from The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Iron Shiek
07-21-2010, 04:45 PM
Pure ridiculousness.

07-22-2010, 08:45 AM
Why not just try a $102 million, infinity year contract so the cap number really went to $0?

Like no one's gonna notice the 17 years.