PDA

View Full Version : Big Ben Is Not The Victim The Steelers Are



HeHateMe
05-05-2010, 09:08 AM
Due to Bens bad decision making he has put all of his teammates and organization in a precarious situation. If you get two rape allegations in one year, thats no coincidence. Ben has been far from a choir boy and in my opinion the ONLY Steelers who deserve the benefit of the doubt after TWO rape allegations are - 1. Troy Polamalu 2. Aaron Smith 3. Heath Miller.
I know Hines hasn't been in any trouble but I don't know if I could give him the benefit of the doubt with two allegations.

Slapstick
05-05-2010, 09:12 AM
We are the victims...


...of your inane and boring posts...

Flasteel
05-05-2010, 09:14 AM
You need some serious couch-time dude. You are either suffering from some type of mental illness or your last name is McNulty.

Oviedo
05-05-2010, 09:40 AM
You need some serious couch-time dude. You are either suffering from some type of mental illness or your last name is McNulty.

You may be on to something.

SteelAbility
05-05-2010, 10:09 AM
Due to Bens bad decision making he has put all of his teammates and organization in a precarious situation. If you get two rape allegations in one year, thats no coincidence. Ben has been far from a choir boy and in my opinion the ONLY Steelers who deserve the benefit of the doubt after TWO rape allegations are - 1. Troy Polamalu 2. Aaron Smith 3. Heath Miller.
I know Hines hasn't been in any trouble but I don't know if I could give him the benefit of the doubt with two allegations.

Aren't that and that in contradiction to one another. Unless you are saying that Troy, Aaron, and Heath are exempt from the "two in one year" corollary based on some arbitrary criteria. :roll:

And, yes, the two allegations could be no coincidence. The first one is a pretty clear case of a delusional chick looking for a pay-day. The second one could easily be leveraging the first one to advantage. Exactly. No coincidence. Where there's smoke, there's fire. Just make sure it's the right type of smoke.

Shawn
05-05-2010, 10:55 AM
Someone is dying to get banned. Can I suggest a HeHateMe rule to be added to our banning criteria?

Oviedo
05-05-2010, 11:01 AM
Someone is dying to get banned. Can I suggest a HeHateMe rule to be added to our banning criteria?

"Ignore" function works great.

SteelCrazy
05-05-2010, 11:03 AM
Not sure how you ban the guy over this post.....I know it goes deeper than this one post, but if he is to be banned it would have to be a post that is worthy of being banned. (although the owner of the site can ban anyone for no reason as well)

Not sure why I responded to this, because I could care less if he is banned or not....maybe that's my point.

SteelAbility
05-05-2010, 11:11 AM
Not sure how you ban the guy over this post.....I know it goes deeper than this one post, but if he is to be banned it would have to be a post that is worthy of being banned. (although the owner of the site can ban anyone for no reason as well)

Not sure why I responded to this, because I could care less if he is banned or not....maybe that's my point.

This is a bit like those bank transfer scams that take the fractions of cents from all the transfers and automatically accumulate them in an account set up somewhere. No one transaction by itself is worth notice. But the cumulative effect is large scale theft.

Same idea. No one post by itself is ban-worthy. The cumulative effect of all posts, though, shows reason for concern.

NW Steeler
05-05-2010, 11:14 AM
Me thinks that HeHateMe should rename himself IHateMe.

papillon
05-05-2010, 11:16 AM
Someone is dying to get banned. Can I suggest a HeHateMe rule to be added to our banning criteria?

"Ignore" function works great.

I have my own ignore function built in to my DNA and HeHateMe has even suggested using it..."If you don't like my posting or posting style, then don't respond."

Unfortunately, using that methodology can prematurely end a thread, but I'd rather that than me doing this :HeadBanger over and over, when you stop :HeadBanger it feels good.

Pappy

Shawn
05-05-2010, 11:16 AM
Someone is dying to get banned. Can I suggest a HeHateMe rule to be added to our banning criteria?

"Ignore" function works great.

Until someone quotes him. :HeadBanger

HeHateMe
05-05-2010, 11:36 AM
So what's the criteria for a messaga board? IF you talk about Ben too much you should be banned? LOL Blame Ben for the PRIMO material. Funny you guys are siding with BEN over the STEELERS. Sorry, the Steelers are the victims.

HeHateMe
05-05-2010, 11:39 AM
Not sure how you ban the guy over this post.....I know it goes deeper than this one post, but if he is to be banned it would have to be a post that is worthy of being banned. (although the owner of the site can ban anyone for no reason as well)

Not sure why I responded to this, because I could care less if he is banned or not....maybe that's my point.
They want me banned because I continue to use the material that Ben provides for me to use. They don't like ANYONE to continuously talk bad about Ben so therefore he/she should be banned. So ESPN, SI, FOX, ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN should all be banned or boycotted by that logic. Wonder why all those outlets aren't reporting stories on Heath, Polamalu or Aaron Smith. Why are they picking on Ben? Poor Ben.

HeHateMe
05-05-2010, 11:41 AM
Due to Bens bad decision making he has put all of his teammates and organization in a precarious situation. If you get two rape allegations in one year, thats no coincidence. Ben has been far from a choir boy and in my opinion the ONLY Steelers who deserve the benefit of the doubt after TWO rape allegations are - 1. Troy Polamalu 2. Aaron Smith 3. Heath Miller.
I know Hines hasn't been in any trouble but I don't know if I could give him the benefit of the doubt with two allegations.

Aren't that and that in contradiction to one another. Unless you are saying that Troy, Aaron, and Heath are exempt from the "two in one year" corollary based on some arbitrary criteria. :roll:

And, yes, the two allegations could be no coincidence. The first one is a pretty clear case of a delusional chick looking for a pay-day. The second one could easily be leveraging the first one to advantage. Exactly. No coincidence. Where there's smoke, there's fire. Just make sure it's the right type of smoke.

Of course. You could have footage of Ben ripping off panties and you and your cronies would search for an excuse. You guys are dellusional. You act like women groupies to be honest. I mean the only person who should defend Ben like you guys do it, his mother.
Mrs. Rothlesberger??????

Leper Friend
05-05-2010, 11:50 AM
the ONLY Steelers who deserve the benefit of the doubt after TWO rape allegations are - 1. Troy Polamalu 2. Aaron Smith 3. Heath Miller.
:wft

That's some great reasoning right there. Let me pick 3 random players.

I think Ryan Mundy , Chris Hoke and Mewelde Moore deserve the benefit of the doubt.

SteelAbility
05-05-2010, 12:08 PM
Due to Bens bad decision making he has put all of his teammates and organization in a precarious situation. If you get two rape allegations in one year, thats no coincidence. Ben has been far from a choir boy and in my opinion the ONLY Steelers who deserve the benefit of the doubt after TWO rape allegations are - 1. Troy Polamalu 2. Aaron Smith 3. Heath Miller.
I know Hines hasn't been in any trouble but I don't know if I could give him the benefit of the doubt with two allegations.

Aren't that and that in contradiction to one another. Unless you are saying that Troy, Aaron, and Heath are exempt from the "two in one year" corollary based on some arbitrary criteria. :roll:

And, yes, the two allegations could be no coincidence. The first one is a pretty clear case of a delusional chick looking for a pay-day. The second one could easily be leveraging the first one to advantage. Exactly. No coincidence. Where there's smoke, there's fire. Just make sure it's the right type of smoke.

Of course. You could have footage of Ben ripping off panties and you and your cronies would search for an excuse. You guys are dellusional. You act like women groupies to be honest. I mean the only person who should defend Ben like you guys do it, his mother.
Mrs. Rothlesberger??????

Search my posts. You'll see I have been very critical of Ben for this whole thing. My point in replying to you is that you don't seem to want to consider the other side of the coin when it comes to your viewpoint. I simply put forth a reasonable scenario that could debunk your blanket "no coincidence" genius.

You still didn't explain why Troy, Aaron, and Heath are exempt from the "2 allegations in a year rule." Is there a reset on Day 365 for that "rule?"

Me and my cronies? :roll: You are seriously reaching now. In fact, do some searching and you'll see that I have duked it out with a poster named JAR who has had a blanket "Ben is innocent" approach. Several times I have made mention of Ben being douchebag off the field. I still stand by that. That GA situation: the truth is probably somewhere in the muddled middle.

My beef is with blanket approaches.

HeHateMe
05-05-2010, 12:12 PM
the ONLY Steelers who deserve the benefit of the doubt after TWO rape allegations are - 1. Troy Polamalu 2. Aaron Smith 3. Heath Miller.
:wft

That's some great reasoning right there. Let me pick 3 random players.

I think Ryan Mundy , Chris Hoke and Mewelde Moore deserve the benefit of the doubt.
Perhaps

SteelAbility
05-05-2010, 12:13 PM
the ONLY Steelers who deserve the benefit of the doubt after TWO rape allegations are - 1. Troy Polamalu 2. Aaron Smith 3. Heath Miller.
:wft

That's some great reasoning right there. Let me pick 3 random players.

I think Ryan Mundy , Chris Hoke and Mewelde Moore deserve the benefit of the doubt.

Well, he did pick 3 top performers. You know, cause high performance on the field exempts you from the "2 allegations in a year" rule. :roll:

RuthlessBurgher
05-05-2010, 12:23 PM
Due to Bens bad decision making he has put all of his teammates and organization in a precarious situation. If you get two rape allegations in one year, thats no coincidence. Ben has been far from a choir boy and in my opinion the ONLY Steelers who deserve the benefit of the doubt after TWO rape allegations are - 1. Troy Polamalu 2. Aaron Smith 3. Heath Miller.
I know Hines hasn't been in any trouble but I don't know if I could give him the benefit of the doubt with two allegations.

Aren't that and that in contradiction to one another. Unless you are saying that Troy, Aaron, and Heath are exempt from the "two in one year" corollary based on some arbitrary criteria. :roll:

And, yes, the two allegations could be no coincidence. The first one is a pretty clear case of a delusional chick looking for a pay-day. The second one could easily be leveraging the first one to advantage. Exactly. No coincidence. Where there's smoke, there's fire. Just make sure it's the right type of smoke.

Of course. You could have footage of Ben ripping off panties and you and your cronies would search for an excuse. You guys are dellusional. You act like women groupies to be honest. I mean the only person who should defend Ben like you guys do it, his mother.
Mrs. Rothlesberger??????

Ben's mother died when he was 8 years old. You stay classy, HeHateMe.

HeHateMe
05-05-2010, 12:26 PM
Due to Bens bad decision making he has put all of his teammates and organization in a precarious situation. If you get two rape allegations in one year, thats no coincidence. Ben has been far from a choir boy and in my opinion the ONLY Steelers who deserve the benefit of the doubt after TWO rape allegations are - 1. Troy Polamalu 2. Aaron Smith 3. Heath Miller.
I know Hines hasn't been in any trouble but I don't know if I could give him the benefit of the doubt with two allegations.

Aren't that and that in contradiction to one another. Unless you are saying that Troy, Aaron, and Heath are exempt from the "two in one year" corollary based on some arbitrary criteria. :roll:

And, yes, the two allegations could be no coincidence. The first one is a pretty clear case of a delusional chick looking for a pay-day. The second one could easily be leveraging the first one to advantage. Exactly. No coincidence. Where there's smoke, there's fire. Just make sure it's the right type of smoke.

Of course. You could have footage of Ben ripping off panties and you and your cronies would search for an excuse. You guys are dellusional. You act like women groupies to be honest. I mean the only person who should defend Ben like you guys do it, his mother.
Mrs. Rothlesberger??????

Search my posts. You'll see I have been very critical of Ben for this whole thing. My point in replying to you is that you don't seem to want to consider the other side of the coin when it comes to your viewpoint. I simply put forth a reasonable scenario that could debunk your blanket "no coincidence" genius.

You still didn't explain why Troy, Aaron, and Heath are exempt from the "2 allegations in a year rule." Is there a reset on Day 365 for that "rule?"

Me and my cronies? :roll: You are seriously reaching now. In fact, do some searching and you'll see that I have duked it out with a poster named JAR who has had a blanket "Ben is innocent" approach. Several times I have made mention of Ben being douchebag off the field. I still stand by that. That GA situation: the truth is probably somewhere in the muddled middle.

My beef is with blanket approaches.
I dont have to research. I am merely going by the basis of your attempts to oppose me in this regard. There is no fence riding here. My question to you is this. IF You were accussed of rape how would you act? ESPECIALLY the 2nd time. I certainly would NOT remain quiet. Spare me with the "Ben was listening to his attorney". Innocent people do not remain silent while there reputations are being ruined. I cite the Duke Lacrosse team. THOSE BOY'S went down fighting the whole way and do you know why? THEY WERE INNOCENT and they acted like it. Who the hell wants to be called a rapist? Sorry sir, you don't remain quiet under those circumstances. Also, how do you explain the circumstances that IRONICALLY went in Ben's favor? Erased footage, Scrubbed crime scene and Victim out of nowhere wants to drop the charges. She was gungho to go to the cops and then 2 weeks later had a change of heart? Not even the HINT of a civil suit either. Smell like some money exchanged hands to you? Can I prove any of this? No sir but I can smell a rat.
Does this all mean that Ben is guilty? I read the police report and there is NO WAY I'm letting all of that crap be said about me IF it's not true. NO WAY.In my press conference I am addressing all of it. I wont need a note. I will talk from the heart and I would vehemently deny it all. Ben couldnt even look at the camera. IF this was Tom Brady you KNOW you guys would NOT take this stance against me. It is sheer hypocrisy and or Homerism. I randomly selected Smith, Polamalu and Heath because they are squeeky clean and good guys in the community.
Have you heard the accounts of Ben in our community? I guess EVERYONE is framing tihs guy huh? You add up all of the accounts of this individual and you come up with a guy very CAPABLE of rape. When the SI piece comes out, refute all of the negative stuff about him and then explain to me WHY the local patrons arent saying the same thing about Heath, Polamalu or any other Steeler. WHY Just Ben?

HeHateMe
05-05-2010, 12:27 PM
Due to Bens bad decision making he has put all of his teammates and organization in a precarious situation. If you get two rape allegations in one year, thats no coincidence. Ben has been far from a choir boy and in my opinion the ONLY Steelers who deserve the benefit of the doubt after TWO rape allegations are - 1. Troy Polamalu 2. Aaron Smith 3. Heath Miller.
I know Hines hasn't been in any trouble but I don't know if I could give him the benefit of the doubt with two allegations.

Aren't that and that in contradiction to one another. Unless you are saying that Troy, Aaron, and Heath are exempt from the "two in one year" corollary based on some arbitrary criteria. :roll:

And, yes, the two allegations could be no coincidence. The first one is a pretty clear case of a delusional chick looking for a pay-day. The second one could easily be leveraging the first one to advantage. Exactly. No coincidence. Where there's smoke, there's fire. Just make sure it's the right type of smoke.

Of course. You could have footage of Ben ripping off panties and you and your cronies would search for an excuse. You guys are dellusional. You act like women groupies to be honest. I mean the only person who should defend Ben like you guys do it, his mother.
Mrs. Rothlesberger??????

Ben's mother died when he was 8 years old. You stay classy, HeHateMe.
It was in GENERAL. Gosh you guys are SOOOOOOOOOOOOOO frickin sensitive MY GOODNESS

Discipline of Steel
05-05-2010, 12:36 PM
This is a bit like those bank transfer scams that take the fractions of cents from all the transfers and automatically accumulate them in an account set up somewhere. No one transaction by itself is worth notice. But the cumulative effect is large scale theft.

Same idea. No one post by itself is ban-worthy. The cumulative effect of all posts, though, shows reason for concern.

Coincidently, that was Goodell's same philosophy for banning Ben.

Oviedo
05-05-2010, 12:42 PM
Due to Bens bad decision making he has put all of his teammates and organization in a precarious situation. If you get two rape allegations in one year, thats no coincidence. Ben has been far from a choir boy and in my opinion the ONLY Steelers who deserve the benefit of the doubt after TWO rape allegations are - 1. Troy Polamalu 2. Aaron Smith 3. Heath Miller.
I know Hines hasn't been in any trouble but I don't know if I could give him the benefit of the doubt with two allegations.

Aren't that and that in contradiction to one another. Unless you are saying that Troy, Aaron, and Heath are exempt from the "two in one year" corollary based on some arbitrary criteria. :roll:

And, yes, the two allegations could be no coincidence. The first one is a pretty clear case of a delusional chick looking for a pay-day. The second one could easily be leveraging the first one to advantage. Exactly. No coincidence. Where there's smoke, there's fire. Just make sure it's the right type of smoke.

Of course. You could have footage of Ben ripping off panties and you and your cronies would search for an excuse. You guys are dellusional. You act like women groupies to be honest. I mean the only person who should defend Ben like you guys do it, his mother.
Mrs. Rothlesberger??????

Ben's mother died when he was 8 years old. You stay classy, HeHateMe.

Please stop feeding the idiot. All 100 of this person's posts are the same thing. This is the definition of a troll. We have been successful getting rid of trolls like this by not responding. Please do the same so we can get the garbage posts off the board and address real football.

HeHateMe
05-05-2010, 12:45 PM
This is a bit like those bank transfer scams that take the fractions of cents from all the transfers and automatically accumulate them in an account set up somewhere. No one transaction by itself is worth notice. But the cumulative effect is large scale theft.

Same idea. No one post by itself is ban-worthy. The cumulative effect of all posts, though, shows reason for concern.

Coincidently, that was Goodell's same philosophy for banning Ben.
No he suspended Ben for disrespecting the Shield and the Steelers. I have done nothing but DEFEND the STeelers.

HeHateMe
05-05-2010, 12:47 PM
Due to Bens bad decision making he has put all of his teammates and organization in a precarious situation. If you get two rape allegations in one year, thats no coincidence. Ben has been far from a choir boy and in my opinion the ONLY Steelers who deserve the benefit of the doubt after TWO rape allegations are - 1. Troy Polamalu 2. Aaron Smith 3. Heath Miller.
I know Hines hasn't been in any trouble but I don't know if I could give him the benefit of the doubt with two allegations.

Aren't that and that in contradiction to one another. Unless you are saying that Troy, Aaron, and Heath are exempt from the "two in one year" corollary based on some arbitrary criteria. :roll:

And, yes, the two allegations could be no coincidence. The first one is a pretty clear case of a delusional chick looking for a pay-day. The second one could easily be leveraging the first one to advantage. Exactly. No coincidence. Where there's smoke, there's fire. Just make sure it's the right type of smoke.

Of course. You could have footage of Ben ripping off panties and you and your cronies would search for an excuse. You guys are dellusional. You act like women groupies to be honest. I mean the only person who should defend Ben like you guys do it, his mother.
Mrs. Rothlesberger??????

Ben's mother died when he was 8 years old. You stay classy, HeHateMe.

Please stop feeding the idiot. All 100 of this person's posts are the same thing. This is the definition of a troll. We have been successful getting rid of trolls like this by not responding. Please do the same so we can get the garbage posts off the board and address real football.
Namecalling? I'm no idiot. The IDIOTS are the ones who defend RAPISTS and get mad when a Steeler fan defends the Steelers.

aggiebones
05-05-2010, 12:47 PM
Mr. Hate, noone is siding with Ben over the Steelers. We are just tired of people beating the dead horse.
The only way this gets behind us is if this is left to die a bit. The only real way to judge Ben on this is how he goes forward from here. Most of us prefer to let it run its course and move on. If he fecks up again, we all know he's gone. So we don't need to judge him REPEATEDLY.
Lay off a bit. If some Browns fan is bothering you or something like that, just agree that Ben used alot of bad judgment. The End.
Let it go. It really doesn't affect you that much unless you let it. There's probably a worse dude maybe even a pedophile living right around the corner from your mobile home. I'd worry more about him than Ben.
Good luck to you.

HeHateMe
05-05-2010, 12:58 PM
I'll let it go when Ben is off of the Steelers. And how dare you disrespect my trailer home? I have made a fine home for your mother and you. At least be grateful.

RuthlessBurgher
05-05-2010, 01:11 PM
Not sure how you ban the guy over this post.....I know it goes deeper than this one post, but if he is to be banned it would have to be a post that is worthy of being banned. (although the owner of the site can ban anyone for no reason as well)

Not sure why I responded to this, because I could care less if he is banned or not....maybe that's my point.

This is a bit like those bank transfer scams that take the fractions of cents from all the transfers and automatically accumulate them in an account set up somewhere. No one transaction by itself is worth notice. But the cumulative effect is large scale theft.

Same idea. No one post by itself is ban-worthy. The cumulative effect of all posts, though, shows reason for concern.

And sooner or later, a poor fax machine pays the ultimate price. :wink:

http://stevemccutchen.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/office-space-printer.jpg

SteelAbility
05-05-2010, 01:18 PM
Due to Bens bad decision making he has put all of his teammates and organization in a precarious situation. If you get two rape allegations in one year, thats no coincidence. Ben has been far from a choir boy and in my opinion the ONLY Steelers who deserve the benefit of the doubt after TWO rape allegations are - 1. Troy Polamalu 2. Aaron Smith 3. Heath Miller.
I know Hines hasn't been in any trouble but I don't know if I could give him the benefit of the doubt with two allegations.

Aren't that and that in contradiction to one another. Unless you are saying that Troy, Aaron, and Heath are exempt from the "two in one year" corollary based on some arbitrary criteria. :roll:

And, yes, the two allegations could be no coincidence. The first one is a pretty clear case of a delusional chick looking for a pay-day. The second one could easily be leveraging the first one to advantage. Exactly. No coincidence. Where there's smoke, there's fire. Just make sure it's the right type of smoke.

Of course. You could have footage of Ben ripping off panties and you and your cronies would search for an excuse. You guys are dellusional. You act like women groupies to be honest. I mean the only person who should defend Ben like you guys do it, his mother.
Mrs. Rothlesberger??????

Search my posts. You'll see I have been very critical of Ben for this whole thing. My point in replying to you is that you don't seem to want to consider the other side of the coin when it comes to your viewpoint. I simply put forth a reasonable scenario that could debunk your blanket "no coincidence" genius.

You still didn't explain why Troy, Aaron, and Heath are exempt from the "2 allegations in a year rule." Is there a reset on Day 365 for that "rule?"

Me and my cronies? :roll: You are seriously reaching now. In fact, do some searching and you'll see that I have duked it out with a poster named JAR who has had a blanket "Ben is innocent" approach. Several times I have made mention of Ben being douchebag off the field. I still stand by that. That GA situation: the truth is probably somewhere in the muddled middle.

My beef is with blanket approaches.
I dont have to research. I am merely going by the basis of your attempts to oppose me in this regard. There is no fence riding here. My question to you is this. IF You were accussed of rape how would you act? ESPECIALLY the 2nd time. I certainly would NOT remain quiet. Spare me with the "Ben was listening to his attorney". Innocent people do not remain silent while there reputations are being ruined. I cite the Duke Lacrosse team. THOSE BOY'S went down fighting the whole way and do you know why? THEY WERE INNOCENT and they acted like it. Who the hell wants to be called a rapist? Sorry sir, you don't remain quiet under those circumstances. Also, how do you explain the circumstances that IRONICALLY went in Ben's favor? Erased footage, Scrubbed crime scene and Victim out of nowhere wants to drop the charges. She was gungho to go to the cops and then 2 weeks later had a change of heart? Not even the HINT of a civil suit either. Smell like some money exchanged hands to you? Can I prove any of this? No sir but I can smell a rat.
Does this all mean that Ben is guilty? I read the police report and there is NO WAY I'm letting all of that crap be said about me IF it's not true. NO WAY.In my press conference I am addressing all of it. I wont need a note. I will talk from the heart and I would vehemently deny it all. Ben couldnt even look at the camera. IF this was Tom Brady you KNOW you guys would NOT take this stance against me. It is sheer hypocrisy and or Homerism. I randomly selected Smith, Polamalu and Heath because they are squeeky clean and good guys in the community.
Have you heard the accounts of Ben in our community? I guess EVERYONE is framing tihs guy huh? You add up all of the accounts of this individual and you come up with a guy very CAPABLE of rape. When the SI piece comes out, refute all of the negative stuff about him and then explain to me WHY the local patrons arent saying the same thing about Heath, Polamalu or any other Steeler. WHY Just Ben?

Ya think maybe the research would give you a better context to interpret my opposition? Just maybe? But that's in keeping with your style - i.e. far reaching conclusions without getting all of the relevant facts. I said research my posts to debunk the implication that I'm a blind Ben homer with cronies. Geeeeeeez! Now that that accusation has been debunked, you just won't say "my bad." You jump to another lily pad of belligerence so you can springboard your agenda.

No, you actually said initially "IN MY OPINION (troy, aaraon, heath) are the ONLY ones ..." You should have said "guys like troy, aaron, heath ... are exempt." This is again in keeping with the lily pad tactics.

That being said, you have some very good points about the night of the incident and evidence missing. I'm not very happy about that. However, there is reasonable doubt still. Any of a number of reasonable scenario explanations could account for some of that.

aggiebones
05-05-2010, 02:36 PM
[quote="HeHateMe"]I'll let it go when Ben is off of the Steelers.

So your whole approach in this forum is to preach about getting rid of Big Ben.

I think that right there is banning worthy. Cause noone here is gonna want to deal with you belly aching none stop about this.

hawaiiansteel
05-05-2010, 04:06 PM
wow, i'm shocked! :shock:

you started a thread about Ben Roethlisberger, QB of the Pittsburgh Steelers?

so tell us again how you feel about Ben, a lot of us are still very unclear about how you feel...

Pahn711
05-05-2010, 04:14 PM
Maybe I'm way off base because I'm new to the forums, but I think the most effective strategy to shut him up is not to respond to him? I imagine these angry responses are exactly what he is looking for.

RuthlessBurgher
05-05-2010, 04:19 PM
Maybe I'm way off base because I'm new to the forums, but I think the most effective strategy to shut him up is not to respond to him? I imagine these angry responses are exactly what he is looking for.

Perhaps he just needs a hug.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_m4FI1xplsaE/Sm3tsShBoHI/AAAAAAAADn8/_HzvMZxAXjo/s320/He+Hate+Me.jpg

eniparadoxgma
05-05-2010, 04:44 PM
For the record, I prefer trolls that are both more intelligent and more interesting. This monomaniac is just insipidly boring.

And the "ignore" thing never works because there is always at least one person that feels they can talk sense to the trolls.

NW Steeler
05-05-2010, 05:26 PM
Guilty as charged.

HeHateMe
05-05-2010, 06:19 PM
I'll let it go when Ben is off of the Steelers.

So your whole approach in this forum is to preach about getting rid of Big Ben.

I think that right there is banning worthy. Cause noone here is gonna want to deal with you belly aching none stop about this.
"I WANT YOU BANNED" "I WANT YOU BANNED" "I WANT YOU BANNED" "I WANT YOU BANNED" LOL

HeHateMe
05-05-2010, 06:22 PM
"DON'T TALK ABOUT BEN" "DON'T TALK ABOUT BEN"
Why you guys get mad about what I post is a mystery to me. I could care less what you post in opposition to me. Why is that? Oh probably because I have TRUTH on my side and you guys don't. Generally, people don't like the Truth. I think that applies here.

AkronSteel
05-05-2010, 06:43 PM
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!!

Give it a break please!!! This is so old!!! I understand your position but to repeat it every day over and over is just rediculous!!! We know how you feel, please move on!!!

:HeadBanger

HeHateMe
05-06-2010, 12:13 AM
What's the problem? Why are you upset? You said on another thread that you agree. I cant tell. You see VERY agitated. This is AMERICA, people can say what they want. HELLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

AkronSteel
05-06-2010, 12:33 AM
What's the problem? Why are you upset? You said on another thread that you agree. I cant tell. You see VERY agitated. This is AMERICA, people can say what they want. HELLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

It's just old man!!! It's really just old!! This is all that we have heard forever and ever and ever!!! Move on....there is nothing you or I or anyone else on this board can do about the situation! It's just tired man!!!

HeHateMe
05-06-2010, 12:40 AM
What's the problem? Why are you upset? You said on another thread that you agree. I cant tell. You see VERY agitated. This is AMERICA, people can say what they want. HELLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

It's just old man!!! It's really just old!! This is all that we have heard forever and ever and ever!!! Move on....there is nothing you or I or anyone else on this board can do about the situation! It's just tired man!!!
Hint: Dont read it. Simple

eniparadoxgma
05-06-2010, 12:51 AM
PEOPLE SHOULDN'T GET UPSET WHEN I POST THE SAME THING OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN AND SPAM DIFFERENT THINGS WITH THE SAME DIATRIBE OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN...I MEAN IT HAS TO BE MY "POINT" THEY HAVE A PROBLEM WITH NOT THE FACT THAT I'M OBSESSIVELY SPAMMING THE BOARD WITH THE EXACT SAME POINT WHICH COULD BE SUMMED UP IN ONE SENTENCE...


http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/3679/derptvguycopye.jpg (http://img190.imageshack.us/i/derptvguycopye.jpg/)

:lol: :lol: :lol: :tt2 :tt2 :tt2

HeHateMe
05-06-2010, 12:53 AM
PEOPLE SHOULDN'T GET UPSET WHEN I POST THE SAME THING OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN AND SPAM DIFFERENT THINGS WITH THE SAME DIATRIBE OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN...I MEAN IT HAS TO BE MY "POINT" THEY HAVE A PROBLEM WITH NOT THE FACT THAT I'M OBSESSIVELY SPAMMING THE BOARD WITH THE EXACT SAME POINT WHICH COULD BE SUMMED UP IN ONE SENTENCE...


http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/3679/derptvguycopye.jpg (http://img190.imageshack.us/i/derptvguycopye.jpg/)

:lol: :lol: :lol: :tt2 :tt2 :tt2
PROVE I'm posting the EXACT same thing. Do you know the definition of spamming? PROVE IT.

eniparadoxgma
05-06-2010, 12:56 AM
DERP

See, you did it again!!!1 WTF!!1 :lol:

HeHateMe
05-06-2010, 12:58 AM
TRANSLATION? "I can't"
LOL

eniparadoxgma
05-06-2010, 01:06 AM
DERP

See, you did it again!!!1 WTF!!1 :lol:

Dude, you've already "DERPED" your way through however many posts you have. Any blind man can see that you've derped before and are derping now. I mean, it's in plain black and gold right in front of you: "DERP".

What more proof do you need? :lol: :lol: :lol:

HeHateMe
05-06-2010, 01:08 AM
Derp Derp. I like that! I think I will use it.

SS Laser
05-06-2010, 01:11 AM
The derp is strong with this one! :HeadBanger

eniparadoxgma
05-06-2010, 01:16 AM
Derp Derp. I like that! I think I will use it.

Seriously! Just stop typing the same "point" over and over again and instead just type "DERP DERP DERP" repeatedly. You might as well. It's pretty much the exact same thing you're saying and everyone will get the same substance from it.

Keep on derpin' braugh. :tt1