PDA

View Full Version : For goodness sakes people can you get it right?!



Dee Dub
03-24-2010, 05:05 PM
Ben never ever admitted to any kind of sexual contact. Never!!

Here is the story form KDKA.

http://kdka.com/steelers/Ben.Roethlisbe ... 52133.html (http://kdka.com/steelers/Ben.Roethlisberger.allegations.2.1552133.html)


Now here is what is causing this ridiculous notion that he admitted to sexual contact.

http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/ben-roethl ... d=10077171 (http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/ben-roethlisberger-accused-quarterback-admits-sexual-contact-intercourse/story?id=10077171)

ABC flat out uses the source -KDKA- yet totally misquotes what was said. And we have Steeler fans sucking this stuff up like that had a straw.

Contempt prior to investigation is flat out retarded. Unfrickin believable. :roll:

Eddie Spaghetti
03-24-2010, 05:08 PM
did this really need it's own thread?

you might wanna step away from the keyboard.

Dee Dub
03-24-2010, 05:28 PM
did this really need it's own thread?

you might wanna step away from the keyboard.


If people are gonna spew untruths ( the media and even Steeler fans), somebody needs to set it straight. Id be the first to blast Ben if this were true. But what is being said and presented is just flat out wrong. And yes I have a problem with that.

JUST-PLAIN-NASTY
03-25-2010, 09:28 AM
[quote="Eddie Spaghetti":3dzo2h1s]did this really need it's own thread?

you might wanna step away from the keyboard.


If people are gonna spew untruths ( the media and even Steeler fans), somebody needs to set it straight. Id be the first to blast Ben if this were true. But what is being said and presented is just flat out wrong. And yes I have a problem with that.[/quote:3dzo2h1s]


All these posts...You are making a fool of yourself.

http://kdka.com/video/?id=70082@kdka.dayport.com
FROM KDKA, the reporter clearly says Roethlisberger concedes he had sexual contact (@1.23) and you still persist to deny it is true.

Your KDKA says it too...Vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension.

http://kdka.com/steelers/Ben.Roethlisbe ... 52133.html (http://kdka.com/steelers/Ben.Roethlisberger.allegations.2.1552133.html)

"Sources say Roethlisberger concedes that he did have contact with the woman that was not consummated and that afterward the woman slipped and fell, injuring her head."

The first step is admitting you were wrong. Go ahead...It is OK...Happens to all of us.

Dee Dub
03-25-2010, 12:20 PM
[quote="Dee Dub":31xjfuv0][quote="Eddie Spaghetti":31xjfuv0]did this really need it's own thread?

you might wanna step away from the keyboard.


If people are gonna spew untruths ( the media and even Steeler fans), somebody needs to set it straight. Id be the first to blast Ben if this were true. But what is being said and presented is just flat out wrong. And yes I have a problem with that.[/quote:31xjfuv0]


All these posts...You are making a fool of yourself.

http://kdka.com/video/?id=70082@kdka.dayport.com
FROM KDKA, the reporter clearly says Roethlisberger concedes he had sexual contact (@1.23) and you still persist to deny it is true.

Your KDKA says it too...Vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension.

http://kdka.com/steelers/Ben.Roethlisbe ... 52133.html (http://kdka.com/steelers/Ben.Roethlisberger.allegations.2.1552133.html)

"Sources say Roethlisberger concedes that he did have contact with the woman that was not consummated and that afterward the woman slipped and fell, injuring her head."

The first step is admitting you were wrong. Go ahead...It is OK...Happens to all of us.[/quote:31xjfuv0]

That is what the reporter says..and that is based off of their (KDKA), previous report and in that second link you provide there is nothing that shows Ben said anything other than he had contact...but nothing that states it was sexual contact.

Again..not so sure why you are getting personal with this?? Is there really a need/purpose for the insults?

JUST-PLAIN-NASTY
03-25-2010, 02:20 PM
[quote="JUST-PLAIN-NASTY":3021waba][quote="Dee Dub":3021waba][quote="Eddie Spaghetti":3021waba]did this really need it's own thread?

you might wanna step away from the keyboard.


If people are gonna spew untruths ( the media and even Steeler fans), somebody needs to set it straight. Id be the first to blast Ben if this were true. But what is being said and presented is just flat out wrong. And yes I have a problem with that.[/quote:3021waba]


All these posts...You are making a fool of yourself.

http://kdka.com/video/?id=70082@kdka.dayport.com
FROM KDKA, the reporter clearly says Roethlisberger concedes he had sexual contact (@1.23) and you still persist to deny it is true.

Your KDKA says it too...Vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension.

http://kdka.com/steelers/Ben.Roethlisbe ... 52133.html (http://kdka.com/steelers/Ben.Roethlisberger.allegations.2.1552133.html)

"Sources say Roethlisberger concedes that he did have contact with the woman that was not consummated and that afterward the woman slipped and fell, injuring her head."

The first step is admitting you were wrong. Go ahead...It is OK...Happens to all of us.[/quote:3021waba]

That is what the reporter says..and that is based off of their (KDKA), previous report and in that second link you provide there is nothing that shows Ben said anything other than he had contact...but nothing that states it was sexual contact.

Again..not so sure why you are getting personal with this?? Is there really a need/purpose for the insults?[/quote:3021waba]


The video report that stated Ben conceded to sexual contact was on 3/10 @ 5:28 PM. This was the source to the article you keep refering to that also says he had contact but no intercourse. The article was posted 3/10 @ 7:27 PM.

Uh oh....I here crickets!


What more do you want. It is obvious the only way you will believe he said it happened would be if Ben stood in front of you and told you himself. Then you would probably say Ben's lips misquoted what his mind was thinking. We are done.

stlrz d
03-25-2010, 08:16 PM
JPN - the point D's making is that BEN never said the word "sexual". All he said was "contact that was not consummated". The reporter adds in the word "sexual".

Discipline of Steel
03-25-2010, 08:22 PM
JPN - the point D's making is that BEN never said the word "sexual". All he said was "contact that was not consummated". The reporter adds in the word "sexual".

I would have to agree. At this point, contact could mean anything from sexual to high five to he pushed her just before she fell and hit her head.