PDA

View Full Version : Foote to sign 3 year deal with Steelers...



SteelCrazy
03-14-2010, 09:14 PM
...maybe.


Steelers | Foote set to rejoin team
Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:52:27 -0700

Terry Foster, of The Detroit News, reports free-agent LB Larry Foote (Lions) is set to rejoin the Pittsburgh Steelers. Foote flew to Pittsburgh in hopes of finalizing a three-year contract.



Read more: http://www.kffl.com/team/30/nfl#ixzz0iCgQUrp1

SanAntonioSteelerFan
03-14-2010, 09:42 PM
I feel so sorry for Foote, being forced to play on a team that isn't competitive and a winner, you know, like the Cardinals are. :wink:

hawaiiansteel
03-14-2010, 10:02 PM
I feel so sorry for Foote, being forced to play on a team that isn't competitive and a winner, you know, like the Cardinals are. :wink:



yeah, to have to possibly settle for a team that has only won six Lombardi trophies must be a tough pill to swallow... :wft

SteelBucks
03-14-2010, 10:28 PM
I feel so sorry for Foote, being forced to play on a team that isn't competitive and a winner, you know, like the Cardinals are. :wink:

He just wants to start so I'll give him a pass on the comments. Glad he's back to provide some quality depth on the inside.

ANPSTEEL
03-15-2010, 08:02 AM
Interesting-

So, if he signs, do you bump Farrior-

Move Timmons to the Buck

and start Foote in the Mack??

not likely, but

Is the combo of

Foote / Timmons > Timmons / Farrior

??

I guess we'll find out in camp if JF really has lost a step, or if last season was an aberration.

Oviedo
03-15-2010, 08:11 AM
Can't wait for the we need Larry Foote in the line up ahead of Timmons posts to start in 5..4..3..2...

RuthlessBurgher
03-15-2010, 08:59 AM
Interesting-

So, if he signs, do you bump Farrior-

Move Timmons to the Buck

and start Foote in the Mack??

not likely, but

Is the combo of

Foote / Timmons > Timmons / Farrior

??

I guess we'll find out in camp if JF really has lost a step, or if last season was an aberration.

They could potentially do a true rotation on the inside with, say, Farrior at the Buck and Foote at the Mack on first down, then Timmons at the Buck and Fox at the Mack on second down, then keep Timmons on the field for 3rd downs. It would keep everyone fresh...you'd just have to worry about teams going no huddle on you, and keeping a certain pair out there for longer than you'd want them to be.

phillyesq
03-15-2010, 09:08 AM
I like bringing back Foote. He was never great when he was here, but he knew the system, knew his responsibilities, and allowed the playmakers to make plays.

I think Timmons was more effective when Foote played on first and second and Timmons played in passing downs. I think that rotating Foote in during obvious running downs will help the defense. A fresh Timmons against worn down defenders is far more effective than a Timmons who has to take abuse in the run game.

When Foote was first mentioned, I questioned the signing for one reason -- special teams. Will Foote play special teams at this stage in his career? I have a hard time imagining that he will cover kicks. I still hope that the Steelers grab a young, developmental ILB, but I'm not sure if I can remember the team carrying 5 ILBs.

Oviedo
03-15-2010, 09:21 AM
I like bringing back Foote. He was never great when he was here, but he knew the system, knew his responsibilities, and allowed the playmakers to make plays.

I think Timmons was more effective when Foote played on first and second and Timmons played in passing downs. I think that rotating Foote in during obvious running downs will help the defense. A fresh Timmons against worn down defenders is far more effective than a Timmons who has to take abuse in the run game.

When Foote was first mentioned, I questioned the signing for one reason -- special teams. Will Foote play special teams at this stage in his career? I have a hard time imagining that he will cover kicks. I still hope that the Steelers grab a young, developmental ILB, but I'm not sure if I can remember the team carrying 5 ILBs.

So you are advocating taking the player off the field who last season was the 5th leading tackler, 3rd leading sacker and 2nd in forced fumbles and basically playing him 50% of the time or less. BTW, he missed 3 games.

Sorry but that is nuts, insane, cuckoo, etc. If anything you take Farrior off the field 50% of the time not an up and coming Timmons.

JUST-PLAIN-NASTY
03-15-2010, 09:21 AM
We don't need to wait until camp to see if Farrior lost a step. Just watch the games from last year from mid season on. This is a confusing move if it does happen in relation to the draft. If Foote does sign, it actually gives the Steelers imediate depth at both ILB & OLB so I like the move. Knowing that ILB was more than likely an early pick on their wish list, I speculate why they want to make this move. Perhaps Farrior actually expresed interest in retiring and the Steelers told him they will reduce his role and put him in a rotation if he could give them 1 more year. I think the size of Foote's deal might shed some light. Perhaps Farrior has come to the end of his career and the Steelers didn't want to show their hand in the draft.

What is more of a mystery is the FA activity of the Steelers. If you add the players signed, consider the positions, and the amount of pending draft picks...It is obvious the Steelers will be active on draft day trading up. However, is it in the 1st? I really don't see them "wanting" to move up after McClain because he could fall to them. Perhaps Haden if he has a good Pro-day. I'm getting the feeling that the Steelers are targeting a C. But I'm not 100% sure which one. Remember, Trent Williams plays C too, he is a very versatile OL and very athletic....The next Dawson???? They pick Willaims...Covers every OL position. This might be a player they would have to move up for. Or is it Pouncey? Maybe the Steelers still pick Spoon or McClain at #18 and trade back into the end of the 1st or top of the 2nd for Pouncey to ensure they get him. It would cost them a min of their 2nd, 3rd, & 5th but they get an ILB & C which has to be high on their list. Even if they gave up 3 picks this year to move up, that would still leave them with 6 more picks in rounds 4-7. Seeing how the roster has been filled up with UFA, you would begin to imagine that is where this is headed.

RuthlessBurgher
03-15-2010, 09:23 AM
I like bringing back Foote. He was never great when he was here, but he knew the system, knew his responsibilities, and allowed the playmakers to make plays.

I think Timmons was more effective when Foote played on first and second and Timmons played in passing downs. I think that rotating Foote in during obvious running downs will help the defense. A fresh Timmons against worn down defenders is far more effective than a Timmons who has to take abuse in the run game.

When Foote was first mentioned, I questioned the signing for one reason -- special teams. Will Foote play special teams at this stage in his career? I have a hard time imagining that he will cover kicks. I still hope that the Steelers grab a young, developmental ILB, but I'm not sure if I can remember the team carrying 5 ILBs.

You can probably justify carrying 5 ILB's since Timmons is also your primary backup at both of the OLB spots. If anything were to happen to Harrison or Woodley, Timmons would move outside, and we would still have 4 ILB's to rotate inside.

JUST-PLAIN-NASTY
03-15-2010, 09:51 AM
I like bringing back Foote. He was never great when he was here, but he knew the system, knew his responsibilities, and allowed the playmakers to make plays.

I think Timmons was more effective when Foote played on first and second and Timmons played in passing downs. I think that rotating Foote in during obvious running downs will help the defense. A fresh Timmons against worn down defenders is far more effective than a Timmons who has to take abuse in the run game.

When Foote was first mentioned, I questioned the signing for one reason -- special teams. Will Foote play special teams at this stage in his career? I have a hard time imagining that he will cover kicks. I still hope that the Steelers grab a young, developmental ILB, but I'm not sure if I can remember the team carrying 5 ILBs.

You can probably justify carrying 5 ILB's since Timmons is also your primary backup at both of the OLB spots. If anything were to happen to Harrison or Woodley, Timmons would move outside, and we would still have 4 ILB's to rotate inside.
Not to mention the fact that Fox is one of those "special" players that is a ST ace who can back up a position. So counting Fox as an ILB is just a bonus. Using this list of Woodley, Farrior, Timmons, Harrison, Foote, & Fox...Even if they draft SPoon & no OLB, for example, you have 5 guys capable of playing ILB and actually 6 guys capable of playing OLB. Foote has worked outside in practice with the Steelers, Fox played outside & inside with the Chiefs as well as practicing outside with the Steelers, same can be said with Timmons. Granted the pass rush specialist of the group would be Woodley, Harrison, & Timmons but if you get to your 4th OLB starting...You are just looking for someone would could play every down on assignment. I think if anything...The Foote signing makes this group deep if they draft another LB.

Tomlinator
03-15-2010, 10:02 AM
Foote helped the Steelers win their last Lombardis and made many of us happy fans.

But he left in a funk when it looked liike Timmons was going to pass him n the depth chart and has most recently talked about the wonderfulness of the Cards. I don'tknow if Detroit let him go or he left on his own, but why take on someone who considers your team his third option and may cop an attitude if he doesn't start?

I'd much rather have us to get younger up the middle. Yes, Foote knows the system, but I'd rather see a rotation of Farrior/Timmons/Fox/rookie over Farrior/Timmons/Fox/Foote.

Oviedo
03-15-2010, 10:11 AM
Foote helped the Steelers win their last Lombardis and made many of us happy fans.

But he left in a funk when it looked liike Timmons was going to pass him n the depth chart and has most recently talked about the wonderfulness of the Cards. I don'tknow if Detroit let him go or he left on his own, but why take on someone who considers your team his third option and may cop an attitude if he doesn't start?

I'd much rather have us to get younger up the middle. Yes, Foote knows the system, but I'd rather see a rotation of Farrior/Timmons/Fox/rookie over Farrior/Timmons/Fox/Foote.

:Agree :Agree :Agree
Foote is the past, Timmons and a rookie LB is the future. Quit trying to hold onto player who have passed their "sell by date"

I believe Detroit released Foote. If true, enough said. They likely found out his success is the result of the scheme he played in Pittsburgh and the players around him not his abilities.

ramblinjim
03-15-2010, 10:14 AM
Fox is also 28, so having him and Larry on the team doesn't necessarily mean we don't take say McLain or 'Spoon. We still need a youngin' or two to start working into those LB Spots.

NW Steeler
03-15-2010, 10:17 AM
Foote helped the Steelers win their last Lombardis and made many of us happy fans.

But he left in a funk when it looked liike Timmons was going to pass him n the depth chart and has most recently talked about the wonderfulness of the Cards. I don'tknow if Detroit let him go or he left on his own, but why take on someone who considers your team his third option and may cop an attitude if he doesn't start?

I'd much rather have us to get younger up the middle. Yes, Foote knows the system, but I'd rather see a rotation of Farrior/Timmons/Fox/rookie over Farrior/Timmons/Fox/Foote.

:Agree :Agree :Agree
Foote is the past, Timmons and a rookie LB is the future. Quit trying to hold onto player who have passed their "sell by date"

I believe Detroit released Foote. If true, enough said. They likely found out his success is the result of the scheme he played in Pittsburgh and the players around him not his abilities.

I agree as well. Unless he is coming in willingly as a backup, no thanks. Nasty - your theory is a likely scenario as well. I think our first round pick is a complete wildcard this year, it is hard to say what position they will target.

RuthlessBurgher
03-15-2010, 10:24 AM
Foote helped the Steelers win their last Lombardis and made many of us happy fans.

But he left in a funk when it looked liike Timmons was going to pass him n the depth chart and has most recently talked about the wonderfulness of the Cards. I don'tknow if Detroit let him go or he left on his own, but why take on someone who considers your team his third option and may cop an attitude if he doesn't start?

I'd much rather have us to get younger up the middle. Yes, Foote knows the system, but I'd rather see a rotation of Farrior/Timmons/Fox/rookie over Farrior/Timmons/Fox/Foote.

:Agree :Agree :Agree
Foote is the past, Timmons and a rookie LB is the future. Quit trying to hold onto player who have passed their "sell by date"

I believe Detroit released Foote. If true, enough said. They likely found out his success is the result of the scheme he played in Pittsburgh and the players around him not his abilities.

Foote signed a one year deal with Detroit last off-season. That one season elapsed, and he became an unrestricted free agent. He wasn't released by the Lions.

Oviedo
03-15-2010, 10:30 AM
Foote helped the Steelers win their last Lombardis and made many of us happy fans.

But he left in a funk when it looked liike Timmons was going to pass him n the depth chart and has most recently talked about the wonderfulness of the Cards. I don'tknow if Detroit let him go or he left on his own, but why take on someone who considers your team his third option and may cop an attitude if he doesn't start?

I'd much rather have us to get younger up the middle. Yes, Foote knows the system, but I'd rather see a rotation of Farrior/Timmons/Fox/rookie over Farrior/Timmons/Fox/Foote.

:Agree :Agree :Agree
Foote is the past, Timmons and a rookie LB is the future. Quit trying to hold onto player who have passed their "sell by date"

I believe Detroit released Foote. If true, enough said. They likely found out his success is the result of the scheme he played in Pittsburgh and the players around him not his abilities.

Foote signed a one year deal with Detroit last off-season. That one season elapsed, and he became an unrestricted free agent. He wasn't released by the Lions.

Key point being they didn't want him back. As I said repeatedly, he is an average player made to look better by the scheme he played here and players around him. But many players like that become legends for whatever reason among fans on this board while players with real talent can never do enough to please.

That doesn't even begin to qualifiy him as anything more than a back-up and definitely not a player who deserves to take snaps away from Timmons.

JUST-PLAIN-NASTY
03-15-2010, 10:33 AM
Foote helped the Steelers win their last Lombardis and made many of us happy fans.

But he left in a funk when it looked liike Timmons was going to pass him n the depth chart and has most recently talked about the wonderfulness of the Cards. I don'tknow if Detroit let him go or he left on his own, but why take on someone who considers your team his third option and may cop an attitude if he doesn't start?

I'd much rather have us to get younger up the middle. Yes, Foote knows the system, but I'd rather see a rotation of Farrior/Timmons/Fox/rookie over Farrior/Timmons/Fox/Foote.

He never disrespected the Steelers organization, that shows something. You read 2 things into Foote wishing for the Cards over the Steelers. One, he might have a better shot starting there. So if a guy wants to start and shows it, that shows his competitive side...That's ok by me. 2nd, saying something in the media about leaning toward another team when multiple teams are interested drives up your price. Foote knows there is a ceiling to the Steelers price and he is trying to get as close as possible. The most important thing about everything Foote is saying is he wants to play for a winner. Since the bus left Arizona with Warner, Dansby, Rolle, and Bolden on it...The Cards are in jeopardy of taking some big steps back. I don't know if Foote has that many years left to wait for them to get back.

This will be on everyone's mind now that I said that....So let me comment. There are questions around Ben...Yes. However, the Steelers are invested in him regardless of the outcome. So even IF he misses time from suspension by the league...The Steelers will still win. I personally don't see Ben doing jail time because if they do have a case he will be advised to settle. His image is tarnished already and at that point it would be in his best interest to try to save his career. Then, it will be his goal to try to rebuild his good name. He will be on notice from the Steelers..."That's strike 2"!!! With or without Ben...This team will continue to win. The fact that the Steelers didn't make a move on a vet QB tells me that they know, by Ben & his lawyer's accounts, that he will come out of this...But he will be covered in $hit. The business side of football is telling me this right now...FOR NOW.

phillyesq
03-15-2010, 10:50 AM
I like bringing back Foote. He was never great when he was here, but he knew the system, knew his responsibilities, and allowed the playmakers to make plays.

I think Timmons was more effective when Foote played on first and second and Timmons played in passing downs. I think that rotating Foote in during obvious running downs will help the defense. A fresh Timmons against worn down defenders is far more effective than a Timmons who has to take abuse in the run game.

When Foote was first mentioned, I questioned the signing for one reason -- special teams. Will Foote play special teams at this stage in his career? I have a hard time imagining that he will cover kicks. I still hope that the Steelers grab a young, developmental ILB, but I'm not sure if I can remember the team carrying 5 ILBs.

So you are advocating taking the player off the field who last season was the 5th leading tackler, 3rd leading sacker and 2nd in forced fumbles and basically playing him 50% of the time or less. BTW, he missed 3 games.

Sorry but that is nuts, insane, cuckoo, etc. If anything you take Farrior off the field 50% of the time not an up and coming Timmons.

That isn't what I'm advocating at all. I didn't say that I wanted Timmons to return to just playing a nickel role. I said that it would make sense to rotate Foote in during some obvious run situations. Giving Foote a few series isn't going to stunt Timmons growth. It will keep him fresh later in games.

Same with Farrior. Giving Foote a series here and there in a rotation can keep him fresh.

The Steelers problems late in games were well documented this year. Giving a competent player a few reps throughout games can help the D stay fresh at the end to close things out. :2c

papillon
03-15-2010, 10:57 AM
Can't wait for the we need Larry Foote in the line up ahead of Timmons posts to start in 5..4..3..2...

I don't think that will be the case if Timmons stays with the Steelers. Could he be used as trade bait to a team that can actually put him outside where he's destined to play at the end of the day and move up in the draft without giving up a pick?

Our first and Timomns to someone ahead of us for their pick...just trying to think outside of the box... :P

Pappy

JUST-PLAIN-NASTY
03-15-2010, 12:12 PM
Can't wait for the we need Larry Foote in the line up ahead of Timmons posts to start in 5..4..3..2...

I don't think that will be the case if Timmons stays with the Steelers. Could he be used as trade bait to a team that can actually put him outside where he's destined to play at the end of the day and move up in the draft without giving up a pick?

Our first and Timomns to someone ahead of us for their pick...just trying to think outside of the box... :P

Pappy
Darn it Pap...Get back in your box!!! :P I have enough to deal with because of all these FA signings and Big Ben trying to put Little Ben back into a box! :lol:

pfelix73
03-15-2010, 12:24 PM
I actually like that idea. Not so sure as to the value of Timmons though on a draft day trade. This is however, just a dream though and not close to reality. He obviously wasn't worth the #15 pick in the draft. So, if his value is a 2nd or 3rd round, then how far up could they go? I'll trade a 1st and Timmons for the LB from Alabama.. Thing is though we also need a CB, so waiting at 18 is the way to go. Keep the depth at LB and then try to get Haden. Haden was projected to the Browns at one point, with the Quinn move, the Browns now need a QB.

:tt1

Lebsteel
03-15-2010, 12:33 PM
I actually like that idea. Not so sure as to the value of Timmons though on a draft day trade. This is however, just a dream though and not close to reality. He obviously wasn't worth the #15 pick in the draft. So, if his value is a 2nd or 3rd round, then how far up could they go? I'll trade a 1st and Timmons for the LB from Alabama.. thing is though we also need a CB. So, waiting at 18 the way to go. Keep the depth at LB and then try to get Haden. Haden was projected to the Browns at one point, with the Quinn move, the Browns now need a QB.

:tt1
Timmons straight up for Paul Posluszny!!!! :stirpot

Just kidding, but Poz is a better ILB than Timmons...

Oviedo
03-15-2010, 12:44 PM
I actually like that idea. Not so sure as to the value of Timmons though on a draft day trade. This is however, just a dream though and not close to reality. He obviously wasn't worth the #15 pick in the draft. So, if his value is a 2nd or 3rd round, then how far up could they go? I'll trade a 1st and Timmons for the LB from Alabama.. thing is though we also need a CB. So, waiting at 18 the way to go. Keep the depth at LB and then try to get Haden. Haden was projected to the Browns at one point, with the Quinn move, the Browns now need a QB.

:tt1
Timmons straight up for Paul Posluszny!!!! :stirpot

Just kidding, but Poz is a better ILB than Timmons...

Then we would have our very own Brady Quinn. Mediocre local boy who has to go to a horrible team to be able to play.

Lebsteel
03-15-2010, 12:56 PM
I actually like that idea. Not so sure as to the value of Timmons though on a draft day trade. This is however, just a dream though and not close to reality. He obviously wasn't worth the #15 pick in the draft. So, if his value is a 2nd or 3rd round, then how far up could they go? I'll trade a 1st and Timmons for the LB from Alabama.. thing is though we also need a CB. So, waiting at 18 the way to go. Keep the depth at LB and then try to get Haden. Haden was projected to the Browns at one point, with the Quinn move, the Browns now need a QB.

:tt1
Timmons straight up for Paul Posluszny!!!! :stirpot

Just kidding, but Poz is a better ILB than Timmons...

Then we would have our very own Brady Quinn. Mediocre local boy who has to go to a horrible team to be able to play.

I'd take mediocre over a BUST... :stirpot
As we are using Timmons, I really think Poz would be better, but we hopefully will move Timmons over to Farrior's spot and get someone like McClain to fill Timmons' spot.

RuthlessBurgher
03-15-2010, 01:27 PM
Foote helped the Steelers win their last Lombardis and made many of us happy fans.

But he left in a funk when it looked liike Timmons was going to pass him n the depth chart and has most recently talked about the wonderfulness of the Cards. I don'tknow if Detroit let him go or he left on his own, but why take on someone who considers your team his third option and may cop an attitude if he doesn't start?

I'd much rather have us to get younger up the middle. Yes, Foote knows the system, but I'd rather see a rotation of Farrior/Timmons/Fox/rookie over Farrior/Timmons/Fox/Foote.

:Agree :Agree :Agree
Foote is the past, Timmons and a rookie LB is the future. Quit trying to hold onto player who have passed their "sell by date"

I believe Detroit released Foote. If true, enough said. They likely found out his success is the result of the scheme he played in Pittsburgh and the players around him not his abilities.

Foote signed a one year deal with Detroit last off-season. That one season elapsed, and he became an unrestricted free agent. He wasn't released by the Lions.

Key point being they didn't want him back. As I said repeatedly, he is an average player made to look better by the scheme he played here and players around him. But many players like that become legends for whatever reason among fans on this board while players with real talent can never do enough to please.

That doesn't even begin to qualifiy him as anything more than a back-up and definitely not a player who deserves to take snaps away from Timmons.

Foote wasn't exactly awful with the Lions, though. He led the team with 99 tackles (70 solo) with 2 sacks, 4 passes defensed and 1 forced fumble in 14 games.

For what it's worth, Farrior had 102 tackles (68 solo) with 3 sacks, 5 passes defensed, 1 forced fumble, and 1 interception in 16 games.

On the other hand, Timmons had 78 tackles (56 solo) with 7 sacks, 4 passes defensed, and 4 forced fumbles in 14 games.

So the young athletic Timmons makes the most plays, while the vets Foote and Farrior had very similar stats last season. Farrior should worry about Foote cutting into his playing time more than Timmons', in my opinion.

Discipline of Steel
03-15-2010, 08:05 PM
Im glad we brought Foote back. and Im glad he had his opportunity to play for the Lions. Truth is, we did get tired in games last year and Foote should be ready to produce...especially now with his new appreciation for being a Steeler.

steeler_fan_in_t.o.
03-18-2010, 11:26 AM
Can't wait for the we need Larry Foote in the line up ahead of Timmons posts to start in 5..4..3..2...

Well Ov.....we did win a SB with Foote starting and Timmons coming in on passing downs didn't we? :wink:

frankthetank1
03-18-2010, 12:10 PM
I actually like that idea. Not so sure as to the value of Timmons though on a draft day trade. This is however, just a dream though and not close to reality. He obviously wasn't worth the #15 pick in the draft. So, if his value is a 2nd or 3rd round, then how far up could they go? I'll trade a 1st and Timmons for the LB from Alabama.. thing is though we also need a CB. So, waiting at 18 the way to go. Keep the depth at LB and then try to get Haden. Haden was projected to the Browns at one point, with the Quinn move, the Browns now need a QB.

:tt1
Timmons straight up for Paul Posluszny!!!! :stirpot

Just kidding, but Poz is a better ILB than Timmons...

Then we would have our very own Brady Quinn. Mediocre local boy who has to go to a horrible team to be able to play.

I'd take mediocre over a BUST... :stirpot
As we are using Timmons, I really think Poz would be better, but we hopefully will move Timmons over to Farrior's spot and get someone like McClain to fill Timmons' spot.

bust is pretty harsh. timmons had 70 something tackles in his second season. a bust is ryan leaf or akili smith. timmons wasnt even a top ten pick

RuthlessBurgher
03-18-2010, 12:29 PM
I actually like that idea. Not so sure as to the value of Timmons though on a draft day trade. This is however, just a dream though and not close to reality. He obviously wasn't worth the #15 pick in the draft. So, if his value is a 2nd or 3rd round, then how far up could they go? I'll trade a 1st and Timmons for the LB from Alabama.. thing is though we also need a CB. So, waiting at 18 the way to go. Keep the depth at LB and then try to get Haden. Haden was projected to the Browns at one point, with the Quinn move, the Browns now need a QB.

:tt1
Timmons straight up for Paul Posluszny!!!! :stirpot

Just kidding, but Poz is a better ILB than Timmons...

Then we would have our very own Brady Quinn. Mediocre local boy who has to go to a horrible team to be able to play.

I'd take mediocre over a BUST... :stirpot
As we are using Timmons, I really think Poz would be better, but we hopefully will move Timmons over to Farrior's spot and get someone like McClain to fill Timmons' spot.

bust is pretty harsh. timmons had 70 something tackles in his second season. a bust is ryan leaf or akili smith. timmons wasnt even a top ten pick

Not to mention 7 sacks (more than double anyone one on the team not named Harrison or Woodley), 4 forced fumbles (the only guy other than Harrison to have more than 1), and 4 passes defensed. Bust, bust, bust. :stirpot